5560 Cloverdale Rd is a 2,030 square foot house on a 2.55 acre lot with 3 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms. Based on Redfin's Pescadero data, we estimate the home's value is $1,074,448.
Single-familyProperty Type
1986Year Built
2.55 acresLot Size
$529Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
Source:Public Records
Redfin Estimate
$1,074,448
$7,000 since September
Recently sold homes
Estimate history
Homes for sale
This home's estimate is 39.3% lower than the average sale price ($1.77M) of 6 comparable homes.
Claim this home to receive a free report every month with insights on the changing estimate.
Earn from this home
Sell
$1,017,039
Est. take-home
List your home with Redfin and save $5,372
Rent
$3,336/mo
Redfin rental estimate
List your home for rent
Market trends in 94060, CA
Last updated September 2026
Sale-to-list price
86.0%
7.6% MoM
Median sale price
$5.7M
$2M MoM
Avg. days on market
138d
69 days MoM
Recently sold homes
1
1 MoM
Provided by Redfin
Sale history for 5560 Cloverdale Rd
As the MLS and public records start to fill up, we'll list the details here.
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$4,071 (+1.4%)
$101,541 + $254,888
$356,429
2024
$4,016 (+6.8%)
$99,550 + $249,891
$349,441
2023
$3,761 (+1.5%)
$97,599 + $244,992
$342,591
2022
$3,705 (+1.6%)
$95,686 + $240,189
$335,875
2021
$3,645 (+1.3%)
$93,810 + $235,480
$329,290
2020
$3,598 (+2.1%)
$91,971 + $230,863
$322,834
2019
$3,526 (+2.8%)
$91,028 + $228,496
$319,524
2018
$3,429 (+2.3%)
$89,244 + $224,016
$313,260
2017
$3,351 (+0.4%)
$85,780 + $215,318
$301,098
2016
$3,339 (+3.1%)
$85,780 + $215,318
$301,098
2015
$3,239 (+1.7%)
$84,099 + $211,097
$295,196
2014
$3,184 (+1.0%)
$81,214 + $203,854
$285,068
2012
$3,153 (+1.8%)
$80,847 + $202,933
$283,780
2011
$3,098 (+1.3%)
$79,262 + $198,954
$278,216
2010
$3,060 (+0.9%)
$77,708 + $195,053
$272,761
2009
$3,033 (+2.1%)
$77,128 + $193,596
$270,724
2008
$2,970
$77,312 + $194,056
$271,368
Tax history for 5560 Cloverdale Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$4,071 (+1.4%)
$101,541 + $254,888
$356,429
2024
$4,016 (+6.8%)
$99,550 + $249,891
$349,441
2023
$3,761 (+1.5%)
$97,599 + $244,992
$342,591
2022
$3,705 (+1.6%)
$95,686 + $240,189
$335,875
2021
$3,645 (+1.3%)
$93,810 + $235,480
$329,290
2020
$3,598 (+2.1%)
$91,971 + $230,863
$322,834
2019
$3,526 (+2.8%)
$91,028 + $228,496
$319,524
2018
$3,429 (+2.3%)
$89,244 + $224,016
$313,260
2017
$3,351 (+0.4%)
$85,780 + $215,318
$301,098
2016
$3,339 (+3.1%)
$85,780 + $215,318
$301,098
2015
$3,239 (+1.7%)
$84,099 + $211,097
$295,196
2014
$3,184 (+1.0%)
$81,214 + $203,854
$285,068
2012
$3,153 (+1.8%)
$80,847 + $202,933
$283,780
2011
$3,098 (+1.3%)
$79,262 + $198,954
$278,216
2010
$3,060 (+0.9%)
$77,708 + $195,053
$272,761
2009
$3,033 (+2.1%)
$77,128 + $193,596
$270,724
2008
$2,970
$77,312 + $194,056
$271,368
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Zoning
PAD
CD
Planned Agricultural District
The purpose of the Planned Agricultural District is to: Preserve and foster existing and potential agricultural operations in San Mateo County in order to keep the maximum amount of prime agricultural land and all other lands suitable for agriculture in agricultural production., and Minimize conflicts between agricultural and non-agricultural land uses by employing all of the following techniques: Establishing stable boundaries separating urban and rural areas and, when necessary, clearly defined buffer areas.; Limiting conversions of agricultural lands around the periphery of urban areas to lands where the viability of existing agricultural use has already been severely limited by conflicts with urban uses, and where the conversion of such land would complete a logical and viable neighborhood and contribute to the establishment of a stable limit to urban development.; Developing available lands not suitable for agriculture before converting agricultural lands.; Assuring that public service and facility expansions and non-agricultural development do not impair agricultural viability, either through increased assessment costs or degraded air and water quality., and Assuring that all divisions of prime agricultural land (except those stated in (b)) and all adjacent development does not diminish the productivity of prime agricultural lands and other land suitable for agriculture.