161 Alice Rd is a 1,046 square foot property on a 0.47 acre lot with 2 bedrooms and 1 bathroom.
1882Year Built
0.47 acresLot Size
Source:Public Records
Redfin Estimate
Unfortunately, we don't have enough data to generate an accurate Estimate at this time.
Market trends in 80452, CO
Last updated October 2026
Buyer's Market
Seller's Market
Seller's market
Sale-to-list price
97.6%
0.6% MoM
Median sale price
$539K
$49K MoM
Avg. days on market
26d
3 days MoM
Recently sold homes
22
3 MoM
Provided by Redfin
Sale history for 161 Alice Rd
As the MLS and public records start to fill up, we'll list the details here.
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,318 (+94.0%)
$2,860 + $10,390
$13,250
2024
$680 (+0.3%)
$2,860 + $10,390
$13,250
2023
$678 (−11.0%)
$2,070 + $4,960
$7,030
2022
$762 (−0.9%)
$2,070 + $4,960
$7,030
2021
$769 (+12.7%)
$1,180 + $6,660
$7,840
2020
$682 (+0.3%)
$1,210 + $6,850
$8,060
2019
$680 (+77.3%)
$900 + $6,590
$7,490
2018
$384 (+0.9%)
$900 + $6,590
$7,490
2017
$380 (+72.1%)
$810 + $3,510
$4,320
2016
$221 (+3.3%)
$810 + $3,510
$4,320
2015
$214 (−35.0%)
$1,010 + $1,520
$2,530
2014
$329
$1,010 + $1,520
$2,530
Tax history for 161 Alice Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,318 (+94.0%)
$2,860 + $10,390
$13,250
2024
$680 (+0.3%)
$2,860 + $10,390
$13,250
2023
$678 (−11.0%)
$2,070 + $4,960
$7,030
2022
$762 (−0.9%)
$2,070 + $4,960
$7,030
2021
$769 (+12.7%)
$1,180 + $6,660
$7,840
2020
$682 (+0.3%)
$1,210 + $6,850
$8,060
2019
$680 (+77.3%)
$900 + $6,590
$7,490
2018
$384 (+0.9%)
$900 + $6,590
$7,490
2017
$380 (+72.1%)
$810 + $3,510
$4,320
2016
$221 (+3.3%)
$810 + $3,510
$4,320
2015
$214 (−35.0%)
$1,010 + $1,520
$2,530
2014
$329
$1,010 + $1,520
$2,530
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Zoning
R-2
Residential Two-Family Units District
This District is established for the purpose of providing for two-family residential development in areas where the land characteristics allow for greater density of use than R-1.