978 Hoods Mill Rd is a 2,044 square foot house on a 6.81 acre lot with 2 bathrooms. - it last sold on January 10, 2011 for $325,500. Based on Redfin's Cooksville data, we estimate the home's value is $822,800.
Single-familyProperty Type
1964Year Built
6.81 acresLot Size
$403Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
Source:Public Records
Redfin Estimate
$822,800
$497K since sold in January 2011$71K since July
Recently sold homes
Estimate history
Homes for sale
This home's estimate is 34.4% higher than the average sale price ($612K) of 5 comparable homes.
Claim this home to receive a free report every month with insights on the changing estimate.
Earn from this home
Sell
$611,487
Est. take-home
List your home with Redfin and save $8,228
Refinance
$0
Est. cash available
Get cash now or lower your monthly rate
Market trends in 21723, MD
Last updated July 2026
Sale-to-List Price
100.9%
+1.7% MoM
Median sale price
$950K
$161K MoM
Avg. days on market
41d
18 days MoM
Recently sold homes
5
1 MoM
Provided by Redfin
Sale history for 978 Hoods Mill Rd
Date
Event
Price
Public Records
Jan 10, 2011
Sold
$325,500
$159/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$9,678 (+6.7%)
2024
$9,067 (+9.3%)
$318,500 + $341,700
$660,200
2023
$8,295 (+8.5%)
2022
$7,644 (−0.3%)
2021
$7,671 (+0.3%)
$276,000 + $249,000
$525,000
2020
$7,644 (−1.5%)
$276,000 + $249,000
$525,000
2019
$7,763 (+11.8%)
$276,000 + $249,000
$525,000
2018
$6,944 (+6.9%)
2017
$6,494 (+8.2%)
2015
$6,001 (−1.5%)
$291,000 + $144,600
$435,600
2014
$6,090
$291,000 + $151,400
$442,400
2013
$6,090 (+5.7%)
2012
$5,762 (−0.5%)
2011
$5,790 (+4.5%)
2010
$5,542 (+25.2%)
2009
$4,428
Tax history for 978 Hoods Mill Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$9,678 (+6.7%)
2024
$9,067 (+9.3%)
$318,500 + $341,700
$660,200
2023
$8,295 (+8.5%)
2022
$7,644 (−0.3%)
2021
$7,671 (+0.3%)
$276,000 + $249,000
$525,000
2020
$7,644 (−1.5%)
$276,000 + $249,000
$525,000
2019
$7,763 (+11.8%)
$276,000 + $249,000
$525,000
2018
$6,944 (+6.9%)
2017
$6,494 (+8.2%)
2015
$6,001 (−1.5%)
$291,000 + $144,600
$435,600
2014
$6,090
$291,000 + $151,400
$442,400
2013
$6,090 (+5.7%)
2012
$5,762 (−0.5%)
2011
$5,790 (+4.5%)
2010
$5,542 (+25.2%)
2009
$4,428
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Zoning
RC-DEO
Rural Conservation-Density Exchange Option Overlay District
The Rural Conservation District is established to conserve farmland and to encourage agricultural activities, thereby helping to ensure that commercial agriculture will continue as a long term land use and a viable economic activity within the County. The RC District is also established to preserve natural features and the rural landscape, while allowing low density, clustered residential development. Residential development is to be permitted only when it is located and designed to minimize its impact on agricultural land, farming operations, and sensitive environmental features; to create attractive rural developments; and to respect existing features of the rural landscape. The preferred land use in the RC District is agriculture. The District is intended to permit a range of uses related to agriculture, to encourage the preservation of large blocks of farmland, and to permanently protect from development the tracts of land which remain after permitted residential development has occurred. Residential lots in the district are likely to be adjacent or close to agricultural land. Residents of property within the RC District should be prepared to accept the impacts associated with normal farming practices; The DEO Overlay District is established to provide land owners in the RC and RR Districts with opportunity and incentive to preserve significant blocks of farmland in the rural area of the county. This district is also intended to encourage the clustering of residential development in areas where the development will not have an adverse impact on farm operations. To accomplish this, the DEO District allows residential density in the RC and RR Districts to be exchanged between parcels. Density exchanges in the District should result in large parcels being preserved in perpetuity, while residential development is directed toward parcels which are able to absorb the additional dwellings.