8370 Peyton Rd is a 3,556 square foot house on a 5 acre lot with 3 bedrooms. Based on Redfin's Coldwater data, we estimate the home's value is $528,940.
Single-familyProperty Type
2017Year Built
5 acresLot Size
$149Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
Source:Public Records
Redfin Estimate
$528,940
$8,000 since August
Recently sold homes
Estimate history
Homes for sale
This home's estimate is 21.2% higher than the average sale price ($436K) of 6 comparable homes.
Claim this home to receive a free report every month with insights on the changing estimate.
Market trends in 38618, MS
Last updated August 2026
Buyer's Market
Seller's Market
Seller's market
Sale-to-List Price
99.5%
+0.8% MoM
Median sale price
$342K
$2K MoM
Avg. days on market
16d
4 days MoM
Recently sold homes
23
4 MoM
Provided by Redfin
Sale history for 8370 Peyton Rd
Date
Event
Price
Public Records
Nov 28, 2018
Sold
—
Public Records
Jan 26, 2015
Sold
—
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$4,652 (+22.7%)
$2,250 + $38,209
$40,459
2024
$3,792 (+1.7%)
$2,250 + $38,209
$40,459
2023
$3,728 (+0.6%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2022
$3,707 (−3.9%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2021
$3,855 (−2.3%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2020
$3,945 (−9.1%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2019
$4,338 (−1.2%)
$2,250 + $26,872
$29,122
2018
$4,389 (+1,286.6%)
$3,759 + $26,872
$30,631
2017
$317 (+6.9%)
$2,030
2016
$296
$2,030
Tax history for 8370 Peyton Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$4,652 (+22.7%)
$2,250 + $38,209
$40,459
2024
$3,792 (+1.7%)
$2,250 + $38,209
$40,459
2023
$3,728 (+0.6%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2022
$3,707 (−3.9%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2021
$3,855 (−2.3%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2020
$3,945 (−9.1%)
$2,250 + $28,123
$30,373
2019
$4,338 (−1.2%)
$2,250 + $26,872
$29,122
2018
$4,389 (+1,286.6%)
$3,759 + $26,872
$30,631
2017
$317 (+6.9%)
$2,030
2016
$296
$2,030
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Zoning
AR-1
Agricultural Residential District
Both Agricultural Residential Districts are intended to be more residential in character than rural agriculture and farmland. While some agricultural uses are still allowed, the primary use shall be residential. This particular district is intended to protect existing residential areas where there is a mixture of single family residential and agricultural uses.; As with other rural areas of the County, the lack of central water and sewer available services restricts dense developments from this district. The existing low population density shall be protected and further encouraged by future development.