3935 Bandy Rd is a 1,875 square foot house on a 1.89 acre lot with 3 bedrooms and 1.5 bathrooms. Based on Redfin's Roanoke data, we estimate the home's value is $310,587.
Single-familyProperty Type
1959Year Built
1.89 acresLot Size
$166Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
Source:Public Records
Redfin Estimate
$310,587
$3,000 since July
Recently sold homes
Estimate history
Homes for sale
This home's estimate is 25.2% higher than the average sale price ($248K) of 6 comparable homes.
As the MLS and public records start to fill up, we'll list the details here.
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2026
$2,899 (+0.5%)
$46,500 + $235,000
$281,500
2025
$2,885 (+9.6%)
$44,500 + $235,600
$280,100
2024
$2,633 (+6.6%)
$44,500 + $208,700
$253,200
2023
$2,471 (+11.2%)
$39,500 + $193,600
$233,100
2022
$2,221 (+12.7%)
$39,500 + $164,300
$203,800
2021
$1,971 (+0.5%)
$34,500 + $146,300
$180,800
2020
$1,961 (+7.5%)
$34,500 + $145,400
$179,900
2018
$1,825 (+4.5%)
$32,000 + $138,100
$170,100
2017
$1,746 (+1.1%)
$32,000 + $128,200
$160,200
2016
$1,728 (−0.2%)
$32,000 + $128,200
$160,200
2015
$1,732 (−0.2%)
$32,000 + $126,600
$158,600
2014
$1,735
$32,000 + $127,200
$159,200
Tax history for 3935 Bandy Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2026
$2,899 (+0.5%)
$46,500 + $235,000
$281,500
2025
$2,885 (+9.6%)
$44,500 + $235,600
$280,100
2024
$2,633 (+6.6%)
$44,500 + $208,700
$253,200
2023
$2,471 (+11.2%)
$39,500 + $193,600
$233,100
2022
$2,221 (+12.7%)
$39,500 + $164,300
$203,800
2021
$1,971 (+0.5%)
$34,500 + $146,300
$180,800
2020
$1,961 (+7.5%)
$34,500 + $145,400
$179,900
2018
$1,825 (+4.5%)
$32,000 + $138,100
$170,100
2017
$1,746 (+1.1%)
$32,000 + $128,200
$160,200
2016
$1,728 (−0.2%)
$32,000 + $128,200
$160,200
2015
$1,732 (−0.2%)
$32,000 + $126,600
$158,600
2014
$1,735
$32,000 + $127,200
$159,200
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Zoning
AR
AIRPORT
Agricultural/Residential District
These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with smaller parcels that have historically contained agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the comprehensive plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the county. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses.