***PRICE REDUCED*** Mid-century modern condo in central Phoenix close to all the downtown amenities. 2 bedroom/2 bath condo ready for your qualified buyers. Features lots of natural lighting, covered patio, tons of storage, covered parking and a view of the community pool. Updated back-splash, counter-top and sink in the kitchen and new wood-style flooring make it appealing to all buyers. Seller will credit buyer $2500 at close of escrow for additional renovations as desired. HOA is planning to repaint entire property with a modern/neutral color pallet soon. Water & sewer included in monthly HOA.
CondoProperty Type
1950Year Built
1,107 sq ftLot Size
$188Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
1 spaceParking
Listed by Rebecca Holt• Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Arizona Properties
Bought with Rocio Baez• Camelback Executive Realtors
FABULOUS CONDO IN A VERY DESIRABLE LOCATION!! 2 BEDROOMS 2 BATHROOMS, WOOD FLOORING AND TILE THROUGHOUT! THIS IS NOT A SHORT SALE! WE GET ANSWERS FAST!! OFFERED AS IS. NO SPDS OR CLUE REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED AS SELLER HAS NEVER OCCUPIED PROPERTY. Purchase this property for as little as 3% down! Ask your agent for details
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$602 (+3.6%)
2024
$581 (+3.9%)
2023
$560 (+0.4%)
2022
$557 (−2.8%)
$2,300 + $9,210
$11,510
2021
$574 (+2.8%)
$2,160 + $8,650
$10,810
2020
$558 (+4.9%)
$1,700 + $6,810
$8,510
2019
$532 (+3.7%)
$1,640 + $6,560
$8,200
2018
$513 (+9.9%)
$1,640 + $6,560
$8,200
2017
$467 (−9.4%)
$1,240 + $4,960
$6,200
2016
$515 (+7.4%)
$1,090 + $4,370
$5,460
2015
$479 (+4.7%)
$1,180 + $4,730
$5,910
2014
$458 (+27.0%)
$730 + $2,930
$3,660
2013
$361 (+5.5%)
$560 + $2,240
$2,800
2012
$342 (−31.4%)
$560 + $2,240
$2,800
2011
$498 (−33.8%)
$890 + $3,560
$4,450
2010
$752 (−12.1%)
$1,650 + $6,600
$8,250
2009
$856
$2,440 + $9,760
$12,200
Tax history for 1107 W Osborn Rd #115
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$602 (+3.6%)
2024
$581 (+3.9%)
2023
$560 (+0.4%)
2022
$557 (−2.8%)
$2,300 + $9,210
$11,510
2021
$574 (+2.8%)
$2,160 + $8,650
$10,810
2020
$558 (+4.9%)
$1,700 + $6,810
$8,510
2019
$532 (+3.7%)
$1,640 + $6,560
$8,200
2018
$513 (+9.9%)
$1,640 + $6,560
$8,200
2017
$467 (−9.4%)
$1,240 + $4,960
$6,200
2016
$515 (+7.4%)
$1,090 + $4,370
$5,460
2015
$479 (+4.7%)
$1,180 + $4,730
$5,910
2014
$458 (+27.0%)
$730 + $2,930
$3,660
2013
$361 (+5.5%)
$560 + $2,240
$2,800
2012
$342 (−31.4%)
$560 + $2,240
$2,800
2011
$498 (−33.8%)
$890 + $3,560
$4,450
2010
$752 (−12.1%)
$1,650 + $6,600
$8,250
2009
$856
$2,440 + $9,760
$12,200
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
—
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,106
Year built
1950
Style
Condo/Co-op
County
Maricopa County
APN
11028065
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Sep 24, 2026.
R-3
Multifamily Residence District
The purpose of the multifamily residence districts is to provide for alternate living styles including rental, condominiums and single ownership of land with multiple units thereon or single or attached townhomes.; The density ranges offered are intended to allow for a greater interaction of residents with at least the opportunity for less individual maintenance, unit cost, and size as compared with a conventional single-family residence.; The design options of average lot subdivision, planned residential and single-family attached development are intended to provide flexibility as to unit placement, variable yard requirements, more reasonable and practical use of open spaces, staggered height limits up to three and four stories and more standardized parking and street improvement requirements. Bonus provisions are intended to facilitate and enhance the utilization of smaller infill parcels as well as unusual and irregular parcels throughout the City.; Along with the freedom that the multifamily district offers are certain responsibilities which must be met for project residents, but more importantly for the overall adjacent neighborhood. These are expressed in terms of standards and performance criteria. The standards internal to a project are intended to increase livability with amenities including landscaping, recreational facilities and project design. On the other hand the exterior standards provide a better fit, [and] better the project and the neighborhood environs. Criteria relating to setbacks, screening and landscaping are intended to reduce noise, maintain privacy and minimize psychological feelings to a change in development character and avoid any adverse effect on property values.
The Biltmore area is where Phoenix goes to dress up a little—palm-lined streets, beautiful homes, great restaurants, upscale shopping, and just enough golf carts to remind you that leisure is taken seriously here. It’s sophisticated without being...