**BANK OWNED** THREE LARGE BEDROOMS AND TWO AWESOME BATHROOMS HIGHLIGHT THIS AMAZING HOME! THIS IS NOT YOUR TYPICAL REO! THIS HOME IS CLEAN AND MOVE-IN READY. THIS IS A MUST SEE HOME THAT ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT LAST AT THIS UNBELIEVABLE PRICE! MAKE US AN OFFER TODAY.
Single-familyProperty Type
1993Year Built
5,371 sq ftLot Size
$242Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 car garageParking
Listed by Jason Rodgers• Visionary Properties
Listed by William Doyle• Visionary Properties
Bought with Tammy Chapman• Keller Williams Realty Sonoran Living
GREAT STARTER HOME IN CENTRAL LOCATION.EASY ACCESS TO WORK IN PHX OR EAST VALLEY. VERY CLEAN 3 BDRM 2 BATH HOME WITH FRESHLY PAINTED INTERIOR WALLS. CERAMIC TILE FLOORING IN KITCHEN. ONLY NEED YOUR FURNISHINGS AND MOVE IN. PLEASE SHOW AFTER 1PM WEEKDAYS DUE TO HUSBANDS WORK SCHEDULE. OK WEEKENDS
Public Records
May 30, 1997
Sold
$91,000
$68/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,172 (+2.6%)
2024
$1,142 (+3.1%)
2023
$1,108 (+2.1%)
2022
$1,085 (−3.0%)
$3,740 + $14,990
$18,730
2021
$1,118 (+1.2%)
$3,330 + $13,330
$16,660
2020
$1,105 (+3.5%)
$3,180 + $12,730
$15,910
2019
$1,067 (+2.9%)
$2,790 + $11,190
$13,980
2018
$1,037 (+7.3%)
$2,790 + $11,190
$13,980
2017
$966 (+5.5%)
$2,060 + $8,250
$10,310
2016
$916 (+7.6%)
$1,800 + $7,200
$9,000
2015
$852 (+2.2%)
$1,540 + $6,190
$7,730
2014
$833 (+32.7%)
$1,160 + $4,640
$5,800
2013
$628 (−9.2%)
$920 + $3,690
$4,610
2012
$691 (−24.8%)
$1,040 + $4,180
$5,220
2011
$919 (−12.0%)
$1,470 + $5,890
$7,360
2010
$1,043 (−32.6%)
$2,040 + $8,160
$10,200
2009
$1,549
$3,230 + $12,950
$16,180
Tax history for 1774 E Fremont Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,172 (+2.6%)
2024
$1,142 (+3.1%)
2023
$1,108 (+2.1%)
2022
$1,085 (−3.0%)
$3,740 + $14,990
$18,730
2021
$1,118 (+1.2%)
$3,330 + $13,330
$16,660
2020
$1,105 (+3.5%)
$3,180 + $12,730
$15,910
2019
$1,067 (+2.9%)
$2,790 + $11,190
$13,980
2018
$1,037 (+7.3%)
$2,790 + $11,190
$13,980
2017
$966 (+5.5%)
$2,060 + $8,250
$10,310
2016
$916 (+7.6%)
$1,800 + $7,200
$9,000
2015
$852 (+2.2%)
$1,540 + $6,190
$7,730
2014
$833 (+32.7%)
$1,160 + $4,640
$5,800
2013
$628 (−9.2%)
$920 + $3,690
$4,610
2012
$691 (−24.8%)
$1,040 + $4,180
$5,220
2011
$919 (−12.0%)
$1,470 + $5,890
$7,360
2010
$1,043 (−32.6%)
$2,040 + $8,160
$10,200
2009
$1,549
$3,230 + $12,950
$16,180
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
5,371 Sq. Ft.
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,348
Year built
1993
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Maricopa County
APN
12293251
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Sep 25, 2026.
R-2
BASELINE AREA OVERLAY
Multifamily Residence District
The purpose of the multifamily residence districts is to provide for alternate living styles including rental, condominiums and single ownership of land with multiple units thereon or single or attached townhomes.; The density ranges offered are intended to allow for a greater interaction of residents with at least the opportunity for less individual maintenance, unit cost, and size as compared with a conventional single-family residence.; The design options of average lot subdivision, planned residential and single-family attached development are intended to provide flexibility as to unit placement, variable yard requirements, more reasonable and practical use of open spaces, staggered height limits up to three and four stories and more standardized parking and street improvement requirements. Bonus provisions are intended to facilitate and enhance the utilization of smaller infill parcels as well as unusual and irregular parcels throughout the City.; Along with the freedom that the multifamily district offers are certain responsibilities which must be met for project residents, but more importantly for the overall adjacent neighborhood. These are expressed in terms of standards and performance criteria. The standards internal to a project are intended to increase livability with amenities including landscaping, recreational facilities and project design. On the other hand the exterior standards provide a better fit, [and] better the project and the neighborhood environs. Criteria relating to setbacks, screening and landscaping are intended to reduce noise, maintain privacy and minimize psychological feelings to a change in development character and avoid any adverse effect on property values.