Fully renovated 2/2 Mid-Century modern style condo. Available fully furnished. May be rented short-mid-long term. HOA Fee covers Electric, Heating and Cooling, Water, Trash.
CondoProperty Type
1970Year Built
1,147 sq ftLot Size
$316Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 spacesParking
Listed by Steve Sorenson• Incyte Realty, LLC
Listed by Johnathan Sorenson• Incyte Realty, LLC
Bought with Oriana Lehman Wood• Russ Lyon Sotheby's International Realty
Look no further...You've found it! You've heard location, location, location. This first floor 2 bed 2 bath condo located in Arcadia is just minutes from the best dining, shopping, nightlife, and outdoor activities the Valley has to offer. Not to mention the Hopi/Ingleside/Arcadia schools. Talk about carefree living. The HOA pretty much takes care of everything. Even the electric bill. This condo is a great place to live either as your primary residence or as your vacation home. It's also very easy to rent for an investor. Come see it for yourself before it's gone!
Public Records
Oct 17, 1994
Sold
$37,600
$33/sq ft
Public Records
Oct 17, 1994
Sold
$50,000
$44/sq ft
Public Records
Apr 20, 1993
Sold
$34,000
$30/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$666 (+4.7%)
2024
$636 (+2.0%)
2023
$623 (+4.3%)
2022
$598 (−3.5%)
$3,170 + $12,710
$15,880
2021
$619 (+1.5%)
$2,820 + $11,300
$14,120
2020
$610 (+3.9%)
$2,520 + $10,110
$12,630
2019
$587 (+4.0%)
$2,250 + $9,020
$11,270
2018
$565 (+4.1%)
$2,250 + $9,020
$11,270
2017
$543 (+2.8%)
$1,770 + $7,110
$8,880
2016
$528 (+8.9%)
$1,560 + $6,250
$7,810
2015
$485 (+1.6%)
$1,280 + $5,120
$6,400
2014
$477 (+7.7%)
$1,040 + $4,170
$5,210
2013
$443 (−38.2%)
$860 + $3,440
$4,300
2012
$717 (−10.7%)
$1,450 + $5,800
$7,250
2011
$803 (−9.5%)
$1,740 + $6,960
$8,700
2010
$888 (−5.6%)
$2,110 + $8,440
$10,550
2009
$941
$2,520 + $10,080
$12,600
Tax history for 4201 E Camelback Rd #77
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$666 (+4.7%)
2024
$636 (+2.0%)
2023
$623 (+4.3%)
2022
$598 (−3.5%)
$3,170 + $12,710
$15,880
2021
$619 (+1.5%)
$2,820 + $11,300
$14,120
2020
$610 (+3.9%)
$2,520 + $10,110
$12,630
2019
$587 (+4.0%)
$2,250 + $9,020
$11,270
2018
$565 (+4.1%)
$2,250 + $9,020
$11,270
2017
$543 (+2.8%)
$1,770 + $7,110
$8,880
2016
$528 (+8.9%)
$1,560 + $6,250
$7,810
2015
$485 (+1.6%)
$1,280 + $5,120
$6,400
2014
$477 (+7.7%)
$1,040 + $4,170
$5,210
2013
$443 (−38.2%)
$860 + $3,440
$4,300
2012
$717 (−10.7%)
$1,450 + $5,800
$7,250
2011
$803 (−9.5%)
$1,740 + $6,960
$8,700
2010
$888 (−5.6%)
$2,110 + $8,440
$10,550
2009
$941
$2,520 + $10,080
$12,600
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
—
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,135
Year built
1970
Style
Condo/Co-op
County
Maricopa County
APN
17134269
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Jul 6, 2026.
R-3
44TH STREET SP
Multifamily Residence District
The purpose of the multifamily residence districts is to provide for alternate living styles including rental, condominiums and single ownership of land with multiple units thereon or single or attached townhomes.; The density ranges offered are intended to allow for a greater interaction of residents with at least the opportunity for less individual maintenance, unit cost, and size as compared with a conventional single-family residence.; The design options of average lot subdivision, planned residential and single-family attached development are intended to provide flexibility as to unit placement, variable yard requirements, more reasonable and practical use of open spaces, staggered height limits up to three and four stories and more standardized parking and street improvement requirements. Bonus provisions are intended to facilitate and enhance the utilization of smaller infill parcels as well as unusual and irregular parcels throughout the City.; Along with the freedom that the multifamily district offers are certain responsibilities which must be met for project residents, but more importantly for the overall adjacent neighborhood. These are expressed in terms of standards and performance criteria. The standards internal to a project are intended to increase livability with amenities including landscaping, recreational facilities and project design. On the other hand the exterior standards provide a better fit, [and] better the project and the neighborhood environs. Criteria relating to setbacks, screening and landscaping are intended to reduce noise, maintain privacy and minimize psychological feelings to a change in development character and avoid any adverse effect on property values.
The Biltmore area is where Phoenix goes to dress up a little—palm-lined streets, beautiful homes, great restaurants, upscale shopping, and just enough golf carts to remind you that leisure is taken seriously here. It’s sophisticated without being...