INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY! Long-term tenant in place, since 2021, paying $2,695 a month, lease ending on 03/31/2026. 4 bedrooms, 2 baths, single-level townhouse. Spacious patio for a comfortable outdoor living. The home comes with a refrigerator, washer and dryer. 2 - car carport with a private storage room provides convenience and additional space.
TownhomeProperty Type
1971Year Built
2,622 sq ftLot Size
$172Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 spacesParking
Listed by Thomas Mastromatto• Mountain Lake Realty
HARD TO FIND single-level 4 Bedroom / 2 Bath Townhouse in Villa Alegre! Tile throughout. Huge living room. Newer sliding patio door + sunscreens. Nice sized backyard + newer block wall & covered patio for family BBQ's & outdoor entertaining. Covered parking space + add'l adjacent uncovered parking space. Needs some minor cosmetic TLC. Perfect home for those inclined to DIY. 4 Bedrooms at THIS PRICE?? This home will go FAST! See it before it's GONE!
Public Records
Dec 21, 2004
Sold
$65,000
$53/sq ft
Public Records
Oct 16, 2003
Sold
$60,000
$49/sq ft
Public Records
Jul 28, 1998
Sold
$45,000
$37/sq ft
Public Records
Jun 7, 1991
Sold
$30,000
$25/sq ft
Public Records
May 1, 1982
Sold
$45,000
$37/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$531 (+2.8%)
2024
$517 (−2.2%)
2023
$528 (+6.0%)
2022
$498 (−1.2%)
$1,750 + $7,000
$8,750
2021
$504 (+5.5%)
$1,610 + $6,470
$8,080
2020
$478 (+4.5%)
$1,240 + $4,960
$6,200
2019
$457 (+5.0%)
$1,230 + $4,920
$6,150
2018
$436 (+4.9%)
$1,230 + $4,920
$6,150
2017
$415 (+4.9%)
$670 + $2,700
$3,370
2016
$396 (+8.3%)
$620 + $2,500
$3,120
2015
$366 (−9.9%)
$570 + $2,310
$2,880
2014
$406 (+42.5%)
$520 + $2,080
$2,600
2013
$285 (+3.5%)
$300 + $1,200
$1,500
2012
$275 (+9.2%)
$300 + $1,200
$1,500
2011
$252 (−58.0%)
$310 + $1,240
$1,550
2010
$601 (−18.7%)
$990 + $3,960
$4,950
2009
$739
$1,500 + $6,000
$7,500
Tax history for 4625 W Thomas Rd #71
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$531 (+2.8%)
2024
$517 (−2.2%)
2023
$528 (+6.0%)
2022
$498 (−1.2%)
$1,750 + $7,000
$8,750
2021
$504 (+5.5%)
$1,610 + $6,470
$8,080
2020
$478 (+4.5%)
$1,240 + $4,960
$6,200
2019
$457 (+5.0%)
$1,230 + $4,920
$6,150
2018
$436 (+4.9%)
$1,230 + $4,920
$6,150
2017
$415 (+4.9%)
$670 + $2,700
$3,370
2016
$396 (+8.3%)
$620 + $2,500
$3,120
2015
$366 (−9.9%)
$570 + $2,310
$2,880
2014
$406 (+42.5%)
$520 + $2,080
$2,600
2013
$285 (+3.5%)
$300 + $1,200
$1,500
2012
$275 (+9.2%)
$300 + $1,200
$1,500
2011
$252 (−58.0%)
$310 + $1,240
$1,550
2010
$601 (−18.7%)
$990 + $3,960
$4,950
2009
$739
$1,500 + $6,000
$7,500
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
—
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,215
Year built
1971
Style
Condo/Co-op
County
Maricopa County
APN
10353153A
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Sep 26, 2026.
R-3
Multifamily Residence District
The purpose of the multifamily residence districts is to provide for alternate living styles including rental, condominiums and single ownership of land with multiple units thereon or single or attached townhomes.; The density ranges offered are intended to allow for a greater interaction of residents with at least the opportunity for less individual maintenance, unit cost, and size as compared with a conventional single-family residence.; The design options of average lot subdivision, planned residential and single-family attached development are intended to provide flexibility as to unit placement, variable yard requirements, more reasonable and practical use of open spaces, staggered height limits up to three and four stories and more standardized parking and street improvement requirements. Bonus provisions are intended to facilitate and enhance the utilization of smaller infill parcels as well as unusual and irregular parcels throughout the City.; Along with the freedom that the multifamily district offers are certain responsibilities which must be met for project residents, but more importantly for the overall adjacent neighborhood. These are expressed in terms of standards and performance criteria. The standards internal to a project are intended to increase livability with amenities including landscaping, recreational facilities and project design. On the other hand the exterior standards provide a better fit, [and] better the project and the neighborhood environs. Criteria relating to setbacks, screening and landscaping are intended to reduce noise, maintain privacy and minimize psychological feelings to a change in development character and avoid any adverse effect on property values.
The Biltmore area is where Phoenix goes to dress up a little—palm-lined streets, beautiful homes, great restaurants, upscale shopping, and just enough golf carts to remind you that leisure is taken seriously here. It’s sophisticated without being...