Welcome to the newest opportunity on the block. This 4 bed; 2.5 bath home has been freshly updated with new carpet, fixtures, and paint. This home is ready for its new owner(s)!
BEAUTIFUL HOME SITS ON A PRIVATE STREET MUST SEE, THIS CLEAN, ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME LOCATED IN SHEELY FARMS,NEW PAINT THROUGHOUT, CUSTOM & NEUTRAL COLORS, OVERSIZE TILE, NEW CARPET, BAMBOO HARDWOOD FLOORS IN MAS STAINLESS STEEL APPLIANCES, LARGE LOFT,4 BEDROOMS UPSTAIRS,WOOD BANISTERS, UPDATED FANS THROUGOUT HOME, CANISTER LIGHTING THROUGHOUT HOME, LARGE MASTER W/WALKIN CLOSET, MASTER HAS SEPARATE TUB/SHOWER DOUBLE SINKS, WARM RICH CABINETRY IN KITCHEN, FRONT LOADER WASHER DRYER, BACK YARD IS RELAXING,GREEN/DESERT LANDSCAPED, OVERSIZED PATIO WITH FANS. WINDOWS HAVE ENERGY EFFICIENT SCREENS, ATTIC ENERGY EFFICIENT, NORTH SOUTH EXPOSURE, AC UNIT UNDER PATIO,WALK TO UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX & TECH COLLEGE,HOME SITS ON PRIVATE CULDESAC, EASY ACCESS TO 1-10, 101 FREEWAYS/ BANNER HOSPITAL, SHOPPING
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,906 (+15.3%)
2024
$1,653 (−2.2%)
2023
$1,691 (−8.0%)
2022
$1,837 (+17.8%)
$4,130 + $16,550
$20,680
2021
$1,559 (+2.8%)
$4,030 + $16,130
$20,160
2020
$1,517
$3,700 + $14,810
$18,510
2019
$1,516 (+10.5%)
$3,370 + $13,480
$16,850
2018
$1,373 (+12.0%)
$3,370 + $13,480
$16,850
2017
$1,226 (+5.8%)
$2,690 + $10,780
$13,470
2016
$1,159 (+4.0%)
$2,640 + $10,560
$13,200
2015
$1,114 (−3.6%)
$2,510 + $10,040
$12,550
2014
$1,156 (+11.5%)
$1,880 + $7,540
$9,420
2013
$1,037 (−4.7%)
$1,500 + $6,020
$7,520
2012
$1,088 (−4.1%)
$1,700 + $6,830
$8,530
2011
$1,134 (−13.5%)
$1,770 + $7,110
$8,880
2010
$1,311 (−33.3%)
$2,310 + $9,270
$11,580
2009
$1,965
$4,080 + $16,340
$20,420
Tax history for 9565 W Monte Vista Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,906 (+15.3%)
2024
$1,653 (−2.2%)
2023
$1,691 (−8.0%)
2022
$1,837 (+17.8%)
$4,130 + $16,550
$20,680
2021
$1,559 (+2.8%)
$4,030 + $16,130
$20,160
2020
$1,517
$3,700 + $14,810
$18,510
2019
$1,516 (+10.5%)
$3,370 + $13,480
$16,850
2018
$1,373 (+12.0%)
$3,370 + $13,480
$16,850
2017
$1,226 (+5.8%)
$2,690 + $10,780
$13,470
2016
$1,159 (+4.0%)
$2,640 + $10,560
$13,200
2015
$1,114 (−3.6%)
$2,510 + $10,040
$12,550
2014
$1,156 (+11.5%)
$1,880 + $7,540
$9,420
2013
$1,037 (−4.7%)
$1,500 + $6,020
$7,520
2012
$1,088 (−4.1%)
$1,700 + $6,830
$8,530
2011
$1,134 (−13.5%)
$1,770 + $7,110
$8,880
2010
$1,311 (−33.3%)
$2,310 + $9,270
$11,580
2009
$1,965
$4,080 + $16,340
$20,420
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
4
Baths
2.5
Stories
2
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
3,723
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
2,461
Year built
2004
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Maricopa County
APN
10234807
Parking Spaces
2
Basement
No
Accessible
No
HOA Dues
$73 /month
Garage
Yes
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Apr 28, 2023.
R-2
Multifamily Residence District
The purpose of the multifamily residence districts is to provide for alternate living styles including rental, condominiums and single ownership of land with multiple units thereon or single or attached townhomes.; The density ranges offered are intended to allow for a greater interaction of residents with at least the opportunity for less individual maintenance, unit cost, and size as compared with a conventional single-family residence.; The design options of average lot subdivision, planned residential and single-family attached development are intended to provide flexibility as to unit placement, variable yard requirements, more reasonable and practical use of open spaces, staggered height limits up to three and four stories and more standardized parking and street improvement requirements. Bonus provisions are intended to facilitate and enhance the utilization of smaller infill parcels as well as unusual and irregular parcels throughout the City.; Along with the freedom that the multifamily district offers are certain responsibilities which must be met for project residents, but more importantly for the overall adjacent neighborhood. These are expressed in terms of standards and performance criteria. The standards internal to a project are intended to increase livability with amenities including landscaping, recreational facilities and project design. On the other hand the exterior standards provide a better fit, [and] better the project and the neighborhood environs. Criteria relating to setbacks, screening and landscaping are intended to reduce noise, maintain privacy and minimize psychological feelings to a change in development character and avoid any adverse effect on property values.