This property, nestled under a canopy of Mulberry trees, offers a spacious 2007 manufactured with 433 foundation and 2x6 construction. Notable are the lighted wall sconces, 8ft. French doors to den / office, enclosed sun room / patio, recessed lighting. Unit was newly painted 2018. A separate 1986, 2/2 mobile, 910 sq. ft. ,den w/ closet, A/C, own septic, meter and life time roof. Not on a 433 foundation. It has it's own entry and address with gate at rear to allow RV access. The detached 2 car garage has one bay converted to a 330 sq. ft. bonus studio w/ o kitchen. Landscape is complete with He and She sheds, tall concrete garden fountain, hen house with yard, garden area and 12 ft. decorative custom entry gate.
Multi-familyProperty Type
2007Year Built
0.75 acresLot Size
1 garage spacesParking
Listed by Dave Lapierre•DRE #01461476• Coldwell Banker C & C Properties - Red Bluff
Listed by • Coldwell Banker C & C Properties - Red Bluff
This property, nestled under a canopy of Mulberry trees, offers a spacious 2007 manufactured with 433 foundation and 2x6 construction. Notable are the lighted wall sconces, 8ft. French doors to den / office, enclosed sun room / patio, recessed lighting and built-in mirrored cabinet / dresser in Master walk in closet. Unit was newly painted 2018. A separate 1986 remodeled 2/2 mobile, 910 sq. ft. , den w/ closet, A/C, own septic and life time roof. Not on a 433 foundation. It has it's own entry and address off Muller. There is a gate at rear of property to allow RV access. The detached 2 car garage has one bay converted to a 330 sq. ft. bonus studio. Landscape is complete with He and She sheds, tall concrete garden fountain, hen house with yard, garden area and 12 ft. decorative custom entry gate. CB438
TCAOR #20191220
Nov 14, 2019
Sold
$299,000
Sep 3, 2019
Listed
$299,000
Public Records
Sep 17, 2002
Sold
$65,000
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,347 (+0.3%)
$78,084 + $233,140
$311,224
2024
$1,342 (−58.2%)
$76,553 + $228,569
$305,122
2023
$3,211 (+2.5%)
$75,052 + $224,088
$299,140
2022
$3,133 (+0.9%)
$73,581 + $219,695
$293,276
2021
$3,104 (−1.2%)
$72,139 + $215,388
$287,527
2020
$3,143 (+67.3%)
$70,725 + $211,165
$281,890
2019
$1,879 (+13.5%)
$70,000 + $209,000
$279,000
2018
$1,656 (+7.3%)
$49,294 + $134,686
$183,980
2017
$1,544 (+10.5%)
$40,739 + $111,311
$152,050
2016
$1,397
$40,739 + $111,311
$152,050
2015
$1,396 (+15.1%)
$38,799 + $106,010
$144,809
2014
$1,213
$33,739 + $92,183
$125,922
Tax history for 23659 Patterson Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,347 (+0.3%)
$78,084 + $233,140
$311,224
2024
$1,342 (−58.2%)
$76,553 + $228,569
$305,122
2023
$3,211 (+2.5%)
$75,052 + $224,088
$299,140
2022
$3,133 (+0.9%)
$73,581 + $219,695
$293,276
2021
$3,104 (−1.2%)
$72,139 + $215,388
$287,527
2020
$3,143 (+67.3%)
$70,725 + $211,165
$281,890
2019
$1,879 (+13.5%)
$70,000 + $209,000
$279,000
2018
$1,656 (+7.3%)
$49,294 + $134,686
$183,980
2017
$1,544 (+10.5%)
$40,739 + $111,311
$152,050
2016
$1,397
$40,739 + $111,311
$152,050
2015
$1,396 (+15.1%)
$38,799 + $106,010
$144,809
2014
$1,213
$33,739 + $92,183
$125,922
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
2
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
0.84 Acres
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,746
Year built
2007
Style
Vacant Land
County
Tehama County
APN
043030022000
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 10, 2026.
AG-2
Agricultural Valley District
The purpose of the AG-2, Agricultural Valley district classification is to implement the Valley Floor Agriculture lands designation of the land use element of the Tehama County General Plan by recognizing lands which are suited for, and are appropriately retained for, the production of orchard and field crops. This district classification includes lands with present or future potential for significant agricultural production, availability of water, and on which contiguous or intermixed smaller parcels having non-compatible uses could jeopardize the agricultural use of agricultural lands. Permitted nonagricultural uses within this district, to the greatest extent possible, should not occur on lands that might otherwise be devoted to agricultural production.