Charming Cape Cod, with Formal Living room with bay window, Two bedrooms on main floor, Master bedroom with sitting room and loft area, on Second Floor. Newly remodeled basement bathroom with jetted tub and new windows. All new appliances in 2013.
Single-familyProperty Type
1935Year Built
8,276 sq ftLot Size
$168Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 garage spacesParking
Listed by Nicholas Miller• Exit Real Estate Partners
Charming Cape Cod, with Formal Living room with bay window, Two bedrooms on main floor, Master bedroom with sitting room and loft area, on Second Floor. Many upgrades in past 8 years, including Kitchen and Bathroom **Sold as is, No survey,100% Tax Pro rations, Buyer Plays all Inspections**
Public Records
Sep 28, 2005
Sold
$245,000
$132/sq ft
Public Records
Nov 1, 1991
Sold
$97,000
$52/sq ft
Public Records
Nov 1, 1985
Sold
$47,000
$25/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,407 (+3.1%)
$20,429 + $64,607
$85,036
2024
$5,247
$20,429 + $64,607
$85,036
2023
$5,250 (−8.6%)
$19,137 + $60,522
$79,659
2022
$5,746 (+4.9%)
$17,493 + $55,322
$72,815
2021
$5,479 (+3.7%)
$15,458 + $54,436
$69,894
2020
$5,283 (+14.7%)
$14,606 + $51,437
$66,043
2019
$4,607 (−3.2%)
$13,157 + $46,333
$59,490
2018
$4,759 (+0.3%)
$15,296 + $34,774
$50,070
2017
$4,745 (+5.0%)
$15,296 + $34,774
$50,070
2016
$4,521 (+5.1%)
$15,119 + $34,372
$49,491
2015
$4,300 (+55.5%)
$14,317 + $32,549
$46,866
2013
$2,765 (−25.1%)
$14,464 + $13,201
$27,665
2012
$3,692 (−10.6%)
$15,582 + $31,523
$47,105
2011
$4,130 (−0.8%)
$15,920 + $42,594
$58,514
2010
$4,162 (+11.5%)
$16,177 + $48,687
$64,864
2008
$3,734 (+6.0%)
$13,457 + $52,815
$66,272
2007
$3,522
$13,090 + $51,369
$64,459
Tax history for 27041 N Ridge St
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,407 (+3.1%)
$20,429 + $64,607
$85,036
2024
$5,247
$20,429 + $64,607
$85,036
2023
$5,250 (−8.6%)
$19,137 + $60,522
$79,659
2022
$5,746 (+4.9%)
$17,493 + $55,322
$72,815
2021
$5,479 (+3.7%)
$15,458 + $54,436
$69,894
2020
$5,283 (+14.7%)
$14,606 + $51,437
$66,043
2019
$4,607 (−3.2%)
$13,157 + $46,333
$59,490
2018
$4,759 (+0.3%)
$15,296 + $34,774
$50,070
2017
$4,745 (+5.0%)
$15,296 + $34,774
$50,070
2016
$4,521 (+5.1%)
$15,119 + $34,372
$49,491
2015
$4,300 (+55.5%)
$14,317 + $32,549
$46,866
2013
$2,765 (−25.1%)
$14,464 + $13,201
$27,665
2012
$3,692 (−10.6%)
$15,582 + $31,523
$47,105
2011
$4,130 (−0.8%)
$15,920 + $42,594
$58,514
2010
$4,162 (+11.5%)
$16,177 + $48,687
$64,864
2008
$3,734 (+6.0%)
$13,457 + $52,815
$66,272
2007
$3,522
$13,090 + $51,369
$64,459
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
4
Baths
2
Stories
1.5
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
7,836 Sq. Ft.
Year renovated
1981
Sq. Ft.
1,755
Year built
1935
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Lake County
APN
09-25-311-006
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Jul 15, 2026.
R-1
Residential District
The R-1 Districts are intended to accommodate low-density, large-lot residential development and to ensure the protection of areas that develop in such a manner. These districts are a higher density version of the very-low density RE District. Like the RE District, the E and R-1 Districts are expected to accommodate only a very small amount of the county’s overall housing needs. These districts primarily serve those households who desire to live in low-density estate areas and are willing to assume the costs of doing so. Because of the relatively sparse population in E-zoned and R-1-zoned areas, the county will not give high priority to the provision of public services in the areas. Instead, public service provision by the county will be concentrated in areas where more intense future development is called for by the Regional Framework Plan. The low densities permitted in the E and R-1 Districts generally permit in accordance with applicable Lake County Health Department rules; see Chapter 171 on-site, individual sewage disposal systems and wells, thereby reducing the need for inefficient public expenditures. The R-1 Districts are intended to implement and correspond to the Regional Framework Plan’s Residential-Medium Lot future land use designation.