20056 HOLIDAY Rd, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 2372
About this home
Just under went major renovation/remodeling. Four bedroom Cape Cod in highly desirable Grosse Pointe Woods neighborhood with two fully updated full baths; one with tub and one with shower. Two bedrooms upstairs and two bedrooms on first floor. New carpet upstairs, refinished hardwood floors on first floor, brand new stainless steel appliances in kitchen with granite countertop. Freshly painted and move in ready. Living room with natural fireplace, dining room and sunroom. New storm doors and interior doors. Full basement with new block windows and detached two garage with brand new driveway and patio. All new windows throughout house. Broker related to Seller. All measurements approximate, buyer to verify all information.
Single-familyProperty Type
1951Year Built
6,098 sq ftLot Size
$233Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 car garageParking
Listed by Donald Harkins• Sprint Real Estate Professionals
Just under went major renovation/remodeling. Four bedroom Cape Cod in highly desirable Grosse Pointe Woods neighborhood with two fully updated full baths; one with tub and one with shower. Two bedrooms upstairs and two bedrooms on first floor. New carpet upstairs, refinished hardwood floors on first floor, brand new stainless steel appliances in kitchen with granite countertop. Freshly painted and move in ready. Living room with natural fireplace, dining room and sunroom. New storm doors and interior doors. Full basement with new block windows and detached two garage with brand new driveway and patio. All new windows throughout house. Broker related to Seller. All measurements approximate, buyer to verify all information.
REALCOMP #2200095595
Feb 24, 2021
Sold
$310,000
$181/sq ft
Jan 26, 2021
Pending
—
Nov 21, 2020
Listed
$319,900
$187/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$10,519 (+4.5%)
2024
$10,064 (+4.0%)
2023
$9,677 (+3.7%)
2022
$9,329 (+133.5%)
2021
$3,995 (−2.9%)
2020
$4,114 (+68.9%)
2019
$2,436 (−48.7%)
2018
$4,748 (+22.3%)
2017
$3,884 (+2.4%)
2016
$3,792 (+3.7%)
2015
$3,657 (+6.0%)
2014
$3,449
Tax history for 20056 HOLIDAY Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$10,519 (+4.5%)
2024
$10,064 (+4.0%)
2023
$9,677 (+3.7%)
2022
$9,329 (+133.5%)
2021
$3,995 (−2.9%)
2020
$4,114 (+68.9%)
2019
$2,436 (−48.7%)
2018
$4,748 (+22.3%)
2017
$3,884 (+2.4%)
2016
$3,792 (+3.7%)
2015
$3,657 (+6.0%)
2014
$3,449
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1.25
Lot width
54 ft.
Lot depth
116 ft.
Lot size
6,098 Sq. Ft.
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,408
Year built
1951
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Wayne County
APN
40 012 07 0098 000
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 7, 2026.
R-1D
One-Family Residential District
The R-1D one-family residential district is established as a district in which the principal use of land is for single-family dwellings and related educational, cultural and religious uses where found appropriate and harmonious with the residential environment. For this single-family residential district, in promoting the general purpose of this chapter the specific intent of this district is to: Encourage the construction of and the continued use of the land for single-family dwellings.; Prohibit business, commercial or industrial use of the land and prohibit any other use which would substantially interfere with development or maintenance of single-family dwellings in the district.; Encourage the discontinuance of existing uses that would not be permitted as new uses under the provisions of this district.; Discourage any land use that would generate traffic on minor or local street other than normal traffic to serve the residences on those streets.; Discourage any use which because of its character or size would create requirements and costs for public services such as fire and police protection water supply and sewerage substantially in excess of such requirements and costs if the district were developed solely for single-family dwellings.