Newer Ranch Home Built in 2006 with deep 2.5 Attached Garage. Vaulted ceilings in Living Room, dining room, kitchen areas. Counter for bar stools, door-wall off dining room overlooking larger lot. Master bedroom with full bath. First floor laundry. Sharp home ready to move in. Sale, price and commission subject to 3rd party approval. Sold "as-is".
Single-familyProperty Type
2006Year Built
0.37 acresLot Size
$91Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 car garageParking
Listed by Linda Shuman• Coldwell Banker Weir Manuel Tr
NEW RANCH HOME WITH DEEP 2 1/2 CAR ATTACHED GARAGE. VAULTED CEILINGS IN LIVING ROOM, DINING ROOM & KITCHEN. RECESSED LIGHTS IN KITCHEN WITH EXTENDED COUNTER FOR BAR STOOLS. DOOR WALL OFF DINING ROOM OVERLOOKING LARGE WOODED LOT. MASTER SUITE WITH FULL BATH, CEILING FAN & WALL OF CLOSETS. 1ST FLOOR LAUNDRY. OPEN FLOOR PLAN WITH NEUTRAL DECOR. BUYER TO MAKE CARPET SELECTION.
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
80 ft.
Lot depth
203 ft.
Lot size
0.37 Acres
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,325
Year built
2006
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Oakland County
APN
762433127009
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 13, 2026.
R-1
Single Family District
These residential districts are intended to provide areas in the city for single-family dwellings as permitted uses and residentially related uses subject to special approval. The districts are designed to encourage the continued use of land for single-family dwellings and discourage any land use which would create excessive or unsafe traffic on local streets; The R A District is intended to apply only to those areas where the existing lots are platted at less than the minimum lot size of the R 1 District or where the existing character of development in the immediate vicinity is less than the minimum lot size of the R 1 District and that the legislative body does find that an unreasonable hardship would be created for the property owners to develop in accordance with the existing zoning district regulations.