4/5 br, 2 full bath, ~1900 sqf, in desirable Southfield neighborhood, updated kitchen with granite countertop, new stainless steel applances, hardwood floor, Central/ AC, newly painted, minimum 1 year lease. credit report, employment proof, security deposit(1.5 month) and a $250.00 non-refundable cleaning fee required, agent owned.
MiRealSource-MiMLS #20937742
Jun 25, 2014
Listing Removed
—
Jun 5, 2014
Listed
$1,600
$1/sq ft
MiRealSource-MiMLS #20648180
Feb 13, 2014
Sold
$62,500
$33/sq ft
Jan 14, 2014
Listing Removed
—
Dec 26, 2013
Listed
$59,900
$32/sq ft
REALCOMP #213206542
Feb 13, 2014
Sold
$62,500
$33/sq ft
Dec 26, 2013
Listed
$59,900
$32/sq ft
REALCOMP #00716226
Mar 25, 1997
Listed
$139,900
$74/sq ft
Public Records
Aug 31, 1989
Sold
$79,000
$42/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,143 (+3.1%)
2024
$4,987 (+5.6%)
2023
$4,725 (+10.7%)
2022
$4,269 (+1.8%)
2021
$4,192 (−1.5%)
2020
$4,258 (+5.4%)
2019
$4,039 (+2.9%)
2018
$3,926 (+3.3%)
2017
$3,801 (+0.7%)
2016
$3,773 (−1.1%)
2015
$3,814 (+37.0%)
2014
$2,783
Tax history for 29539 Chelmsford Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,143 (+3.1%)
2024
$4,987 (+5.6%)
2023
$4,725 (+10.7%)
2022
$4,269 (+1.8%)
2021
$4,192 (−1.5%)
2020
$4,258 (+5.4%)
2019
$4,039 (+2.9%)
2018
$3,926 (+3.3%)
2017
$3,801 (+0.7%)
2016
$3,773 (−1.1%)
2015
$3,814 (+37.0%)
2014
$2,783
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
3
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
71 ft.
Lot depth
127 ft.
Lot size
9,148 Sq. Ft.
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
1,881
Year built
1957
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Oakland County
APN
762411334022
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 12, 2026.
R-A
Single Family District
The R A District is intended to apply only to those areas where the existing lots are platted at less than the minimum lot size of the R 1 District or where the existing character of development in the immediate vicinity is less than the minimum lot size of the R 1 District and that the legislative body does find that an unreasonable hardship would be created for the property owners to develop in accordance with the existing zoning district regulations.