All the peace & quiet you can imagine! This lovely home in a country setting has a large, private lot, rocking chair front porch, huge rear decks w/above ground pool, detached 1 car garage with covered porch area to the side for entertaining. Very pretty hardwood flooring. Stainless Steel appliances. Spacious rooms throughout the house, owner's BR on the main level with beautiful bath, separate tub & shower. Also has its own screened porch. Super nice bedrooms and baths upstairs with loads of space for study, work at home, playroom, etc. Septic permit is for 3 bedrooms but current owner used bonus upstairs as a bedroom for a child. Pulldown attic stairs lead to lots of storage space potential. Additional enclosed, screened porch area off eat-in kitchen with attractive tile flooring. New front stairs, new gravel in drive. Home back on market at no fault of house. Buyer could not perform.
2 story home featuring large rooms, master suite on main level, screened porch, rocking chair front porch and large deck. Wood floors and lots of storage space. Large lot and lots of potential. Painted in neutral colors. See attached.
CANOPYMLS as Distributed by MLS Grid #R55191
Jul 26, 2013
Sold
$120,000
$42/sq ft
Jun 12, 2013
Listed
$125,000
$44/sq ft
CANOPYMLS as Distributed by MLS Grid #931421
Apr 1, 2010
Listed
$175,000
$62/sq ft
CANOPYMLS as Distributed by MLS Grid #907174
Dec 19, 2009
Listed
$190,000
$67/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2026
$2,175
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2025
$2,175
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2024
$2,175 (+3.4%)
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2023
$2,105 (+32.3%)
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2022
$1,591 (+18.7%)
$20,000 + $193,588
$213,588
2020
$1,340
$20,000 + $161,702
$181,702
2019
$1,340 (+26.1%)
$20,000 + $161,702
$181,702
2018
$1,063
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2017
$1,063
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2016
$1,062
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2015
$1,062 (+2.8%)
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2014
$1,033 (+3.9%)
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
2013
$994 (−1.5%)
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
2012
$1,009
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
2011
$1,009
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
Tax history for 2890 Leonard Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2026
$2,175
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2025
$2,175
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2024
$2,175 (+3.4%)
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2023
$2,105 (+32.3%)
$28,000 + $287,285
$315,285
2022
$1,591 (+18.7%)
$20,000 + $193,588
$213,588
2020
$1,340
$20,000 + $161,702
$181,702
2019
$1,340 (+26.1%)
$20,000 + $161,702
$181,702
2018
$1,063
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2017
$1,063
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2016
$1,062
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2015
$1,062 (+2.8%)
$20,000 + $125,298
$145,298
2014
$1,033 (+3.9%)
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
2013
$994 (−1.5%)
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
2012
$1,009
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
2011
$1,009
$20,000 + $125,741
$145,741
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
2
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
1.2 Acres
Year renovated
2000
Sq. Ft.
2,730
Year built
1993
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Rowan County
APN
601 040
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Sep 16, 2026.
RA
Rural Agricultural
This district is developed to provide for a minimum level of land use regulations appropriate for outlying areas of the county. These outlying areas typically consist of rural single-family housing, larger tracts of land used for agricultural purposes, and instances of nonresidential uses intermingled. Multifamily uses are discouraged in this district. This district would provide for protection from the most intensive land uses while containing provisions for a variety of home-based business opportunities and other nonresidential uses deemed appropriate through a special use permit process. It is the intent of this district to rely upon development standards to protect residences from potential adverse impacts of allowed nonresidential uses. The most intensive land uses would not be allowed in this district.