Jodi St Clair • Home Station Realty, (740) 683-0178
See all
Provided by Redfin
Sale history for 6352 Lithopolis Rd
Date
Event
Price
CBRMLS #214021973
Jul 14, 2014
Sold
$300,000
$68/sq ft
May 22, 2014
Listing Removed
—
May 7, 2014
Listed
$314,900
$72/sq ft
CBRMLS #2721504
Jul 11, 2007
Sold
$339,000
$77/sq ft
Jun 17, 2007
Listing Removed
—
May 4, 2007
Listed
$359,900
$82/sq ft
+5
ALL BRICK CUSTOM HOME ON NEARLY 3 ACRES. OVER 3000 SQ FT OF LIV SPACE & FINISHED WALKOUT LOWER LEVEL. THREE BEDROOMS W/ THREE FULL BATHS, POSSIBLE DEN OR FOURTH BEDROOM. SPACIOUS GREAT RM W/ VAULTED CEILING LEADS YOU TO THE SECLUDED SCREENED IN PORCH W/ HOT TUB. TONS OF UPDATES. .. VERY CLEAN & NEUTRAL!
CBRMLS #2515199
Nov 1, 2005
Listing Removed
—
Apr 11, 2005
Listed
$348,500
$79/sq ft
CBRMLS #2407402
Nov 16, 2004
Listing Removed
—
Mar 2, 2004
Listed
$349,700
$80/sq ft
CBRMLS #2322076
Dec 23, 2003
Listing Removed
—
Jun 20, 2003
Listed
$349,700
$80/sq ft
CBRMLS #2011935
Sep 28, 2000
Listing Removed
—
Apr 26, 2000
Listed
$294,700
$67/sq ft
CBRMLS #9912930
Apr 24, 2000
Listing Removed
—
May 10, 1999
Listed
$294,700
$67/sq ft
CBRMLS #9817338
May 9, 1999
Listing Removed
—
Jun 2, 1998
Listed
$299,900
$68/sq ft
CBRMLS #9700140
Sep 11, 1997
Listing Removed
—
Mar 13, 1997
Listed
$299,900
$68/sq ft
CBRMLS #55737
Jan 5, 1997
Listing Removed
—
Jan 18, 1996
Listed
$309,900
$71/sq ft
CBRMLS #22925
Dec 29, 1995
Listing Removed
—
Jun 30, 1995
Listed
$299,900
$68/sq ft
Public Records
Aug 3, 1993
Sold
$240,000
$55/sq ft
Public Records
Dec 8, 1987
Sold
$42,000
$10/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$8,144 (+0.7%)
$38,955 + $138,320
$177,275
2024
$8,089 (+0.5%)
$38,955 + $138,320
$177,275
2023
$8,047 (+32.6%)
$38,955 + $138,320
$177,275
2022
$6,068 (−0.4%)
$23,380 + $86,205
$109,585
2021
$6,091 (−0.2%)
$23,380 + $86,205
$109,585
2020
$6,106 (−5.9%)
$23,380 + $86,205
$109,585
2019
$6,487 (−0.8%)
$19,495 + $83,580
$103,075
2017
$6,538 (−6.0%)
$19,495 + $83,580
$103,075
2016
$6,953 (−9.6%)
$19,950 + $79,800
$99,750
2015
$7,689 (+16.5%)
$19,950 + $79,800
$99,750
2014
$6,602
$19,950 + $79,800
$99,750
Tax history for 6352 Lithopolis Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$8,144 (+0.7%)
$38,955 + $138,320
$177,275
2024
$8,089 (+0.5%)
$38,955 + $138,320
$177,275
2023
$8,047 (+32.6%)
$38,955 + $138,320
$177,275
2022
$6,068 (−0.4%)
$23,380 + $86,205
$109,585
2021
$6,091 (−0.2%)
$23,380 + $86,205
$109,585
2020
$6,106 (−5.9%)
$23,380 + $86,205
$109,585
2019
$6,487 (−0.8%)
$19,495 + $83,580
$103,075
2017
$6,538 (−6.0%)
$19,495 + $83,580
$103,075
2016
$6,953 (−9.6%)
$19,950 + $79,800
$99,750
2015
$7,689 (+16.5%)
$19,950 + $79,800
$99,750
2014
$6,602
$19,950 + $79,800
$99,750
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
4
Baths
3
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
2.76 Acres
Year renovated
1988
Sq. Ft.
3,287
Year built
1988
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Franklin County
APN
180-004684-00
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Jul 9, 2026.
R
Rural District
The Rural District is intended for agricultural and residential development in the County where the conservation of resources is important or where appropriate urban use of the land cannot be achieved because of the lack of urban services, most importantly centralized water and sanitary sewer. The principal permitted uses are agriculture, residential subdivisions and farm dwellings.; The intent of these Rural District Regulations is to protect farmland, lands in current agricultural use valuation, prime agricultural soils, open land and residential land from the intrusion and premature development of urban uses not performing a function necessary to the agricultural and residential use of the land or meeting the social, cultural or economic growth needs of the County. Because land in the Rural District is the most subject to being placed in another Zoning District as growth of the County occurs, such changes should be made with due concern to the protection of established uses.