Beautiful Three bedroom brick ranch home nestled on a . 84 acre lot, in E. Pikeland Township. This home has been lovingly cared for by its present owners. Features 3 bedrooms, 2 full bathrooms, 2 car garage , lower level family room, shop/storage room and outdoor shed. Updates over the last few years include: Freshly painted interior, new windows, new garage door openers, concrete driveway, fireplace propane insert and propane tank, refrigerator, a new roof was installed in 2012. Make this house your home. Due to Covid 19 Sellers ask that you wear mask and gloves when viewing this home and fill out the covid 19 form attached under documents.
Single-familyProperty Type
1967Year Built
0.84 acresLot Size
$352Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
2 car garageParking
Listed by Jamie L Rennis• BHHS Fox & Roach-Haverford
PRICE REDUCED! Fantastic Buy. This three bedroom raised rancher in E. Pikeland Township is in excellent condition. House has beautiful hardwood floors throughout, kitehen has been updated with SS stove, microwave and dishwasher. House has been freshly painted throughout in neutral colors. LR has brick gas burning fireplace, and this house also has an oversized two car garage. Basement waterproofing completed throughout entire lot. Recreation room is in lower level off of the garage. The lot is in a natural quiet setting with a stream running though it with trees on lot. This house has been very well maintained and is easy to show. Bring all offers. This will be a win/win for your client and for the owner.
BRIGHT MLS #1006362234
Dec 31, 2008
Listing Removed
—
Jun 2, 2008
Listed
$299,900
$207/sq ft
Public Records
Apr 1, 1990
Sold
$145,000
$100/sq ft
Public Records
Jun 1, 1982
Sold
$62,000
$43/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2026
$5,501 (+3.9%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2025
$5,296 (+4.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2024
$5,058 (+1.0%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2023
$5,006 (+0.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2022
$4,971 (+1.4%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2021
$4,904 (+2.2%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2020
$4,797 (+1.9%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2019
$4,706 (+2.1%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2018
$4,609 (+1.3%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2017
$4,552 (+1.0%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2015
$4,507 (+0.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2014
$4,474 (+1.2%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2013
$4,421 (+2.0%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2012
$4,333 (+2.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2011
$4,220 (+2.2%)
$51,630 + $81,880
$133,510
2010
$4,130
$51,630 + $81,880
$133,510
Tax history for 92 E Seven Stars Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2026
$5,501 (+3.9%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2025
$5,296 (+4.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2024
$5,058 (+1.0%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2023
$5,006 (+0.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2022
$4,971 (+1.4%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2021
$4,904 (+2.2%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2020
$4,797 (+1.9%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2019
$4,706 (+2.1%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2018
$4,609 (+1.3%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2017
$4,552 (+1.0%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2015
$4,507 (+0.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2014
$4,474 (+1.2%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2013
$4,421 (+2.0%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2012
$4,333 (+2.7%)
$51,630 + $82,400
$134,030
2011
$4,220 (+2.2%)
$51,630 + $81,880
$133,510
2010
$4,130
$51,630 + $81,880
$133,510
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
3
Baths
1
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
0.84 Acres
Year renovated
2011
Sq. Ft.
1,448
Year built
1967
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Chester County
APN
2602R00290000
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 3, 2026.
R-2
Community Residential District
The R-2, Community Residential District, is intended primarily to enable the development of stable, well-designed residential neighborhoods with single-family detached dwellings at densities appropriate to the existing pattern of development and the availability of supporting facilities. In general alternative forms of residential use and most non-residential uses are deemed inappropriate within the R-2 District.