Welcome to this FULLY RENOVATED 3 bedroom, 3.5 bathroom home in Rock Hill, SC, situated on a large corner lot with a two car garage! Special features include: NEW wide plank wood floors throughout and NEW carpet in the bedrooms, NEW paint, decorative wood trim details in the foyer and dining room, NEW lighting, and and open flow between the kitchen and living room which features a painted fireplace and NEW mantel! The gorgeous kitchen has granite counter tops, subway tile back splash, NEW cabinets, a center island with butcher block counters, and stainless steel oven range, microwave, and dishwasher! There is a built in desk between the kitchen and living room for added storage and convenience. All bathrooms have been fully updated, NEW vanities, lighting, tile, and two have granite counter tops! The owner's suite has an ensuite bathroom with dual sinks and an oversized tile shower, and the most beautiful tile floor! Enjoy time outside overlooking the treeline and private yard.
Single-familyProperty Type
1969Year Built
0.52 acresLot Size
$202Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
1 spaceParking
Listed by Stacey Sauls• Keller Williams Connected
Bought with Ben Lastra• Allen Tate Providence @485
Home is ready for new owners! Close to everything!! Four bedrooms, two and half baths. 2 car garage, large corner lot, eat-in kitchen, formal living and dining room. Family room with fireplace. Excellent deal at this price. Do Not Wait!! At this price, it will not last long!!
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$2,647 (+12.6%)
2024
$2,350 (−0.3%)
2023
$2,356 (−0.7%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2022
$2,372 (−0.2%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2021
$2,378 (−40.9%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2020
$4,022 (+10.1%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2019
$3,654 (+327.2%)
$35,000 + $126,946
$161,946
2018
$855 (+3.8%)
$35,000 + $108,500
$143,500
2017
$824 (+1.0%)
$35,000 + $108,500
$143,500
2016
$816 (+2.9%)
$35,000 + $108,500
$143,500
2013
$793 (+0.9%)
2012
$786
$1,400 + $4,380
$5,780
Tax history for 1632 Colony Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$2,647 (+12.6%)
2024
$2,350 (−0.3%)
2023
$2,356 (−0.7%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2022
$2,372 (−0.2%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2021
$2,378 (−40.9%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2020
$4,022 (+10.1%)
$35,000 + $232,776
$267,776
2019
$3,654 (+327.2%)
$35,000 + $126,946
$161,946
2018
$855 (+3.8%)
$35,000 + $108,500
$143,500
2017
$824 (+1.0%)
$35,000 + $108,500
$143,500
2016
$816 (+2.9%)
$35,000 + $108,500
$143,500
2013
$793 (+0.9%)
2012
$786
$1,400 + $4,380
$5,780
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
3.5
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
0.52 Acres
Year renovated
2000
Sq. Ft.
2,011
Year built
1962
Style
Single Family Residential
County
York County
APN
6300203008
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 17, 2026.
SF-3
Single-Family Residential-3 District
These residential districts are established to primarily provide for single-family detached residential development. A few complementary uses customarily found in residential zoning districts, such as religious institutions, may also be allowed.; These districts are intended to be located in the Neighborhood Residential areas shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. To determine whether SF-3 or SF-4 is more appropriate, the lot sizes in nearby existing neighborhoods will be considered as well as adjacent land uses and the designations of adjacent land on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. For example, if the property proposed to be developed is adjacent to an Edge Management area shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map and is developed with large-lot residential uses, SF-3 would be considered a more appropriate zoning district for the development, whereas if the property to be developed is located more towards the center urban area of the City and is adjacent to mid-density residential subdivisions, SF-4 would be considered a more appropriate zoning district.