Looking for a great ranch style home well here it is! Beautiful wood laminate flooring throughout the house. Great room with fireplace and vaulted ceilings. Nice shelving above great room and dining. Split bedroom plan. Master bath has double sinks and soaking tub. Kitchen has been freshly painted along with great room, dining and bathroom. Water heater replaced this month. Enjoy your evenings on the full front porch or screened back porch. Stoned patio and fire pit in the back. Storage shed has power. Backyard has some fencing. NO HOA!
Single-familyProperty Type
1999Year Built
0.26 acresLot Size
$228Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
4 spacesParking
Listed by Connie Ann Delaney• Howard Hanna Allen Tate Rock Hill
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
0.26 Acres
Year renovated
2012
Sq. Ft.
1,242
Year built
1999
Style
Single Family Residential
County
York County
APN
6190301010
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 17, 2026.
SF-4
Single-Family Residential-4 District
These residential districts are established to primarily provide for single-family detached residential development. A few complementary uses customarily found in residential zoning districts, such as religious institutions, may also be allowed.; These districts are intended to be located in the Neighborhood Residential areas shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. To determine whether SF-3 or SF-4 is more appropriate, the lot sizes in nearby existing neighborhoods will be considered as well as adjacent land uses and the designations of adjacent land on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. For example, if the property proposed to be developed is adjacent to an Edge Management area shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map and is developed with large-lot residential uses, SF-3 would be considered a more appropriate zoning district for the development, whereas if the property to be developed is located more towards the center urban area of the City and is adjacent to mid-density residential subdivisions, SF-4 would be considered a more appropriate zoning district.