BACK ON THE MARKET AT NO FAULT OF SELLER. All brick ranch in popular Winthrop Downs. Great investment property or for first time home buyer. Spacious living room, large dining area and kitchen. 3 bedrooms and 2 full baths. Hardwood, tile and vinyl flooring throughout. Large fenced back yard, single carport with a large parking pad. This home has been a rental property for a long time. Rent is currently $850/month but seller says could easily be $1,000. Close to Winthrop University, shopping, restaurants and intestate.
Single-familyProperty Type
1970Year Built
0.36 acresLot Size
$203Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
1 spaceParking
Listed by Stephen Cooley• Stephen Cooley Real Estate Group
Bought with Stephen Cooley• Stephen Cooley Real Estate Group
Great home, below tax value! Currently rented. This full brick ranch home has 3 bedrooms and 2 full baths and is in a desireable neighborhood. Close to Cherry Park, I-77, shopping and an easy drive to Uptown Charlotte. Spacious living room. Open kitchen and large dining room. Beautiful tress and level lot. 1 car carport with a storage room. Front porch. New gutters. Laundry room/mud room. Fenced back yard with patio. Low York County taxes!!
CANOPYMLS as Distributed by MLS Grid #2155027
Dec 5, 2013
Sold
$55,000
$41/sq ft
Dec 3, 2013
Listed
—
+5
All Owner Occupants must sign Owner Occupant Certification in Associated Docs. OwnerOccupant Offers Only for 1st 15 days. See www.HomePath.com for the countdown clock for the First Look Period. The seller has directed that all offers onthis listing must be made online via www.homepath.com. Please go to www.homepath.com to make an offer. Pg 2 of SC contract attached for additional verbiage.
Public Records
Aug 4, 2011
Sold
$75,000
$56/sq ft
Public Records
Oct 2, 2003
Sold
$95,000
$71/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,649 (+12.6%)
2024
$1,464 (−0.3%)
2023
$1,468 (−0.7%)
$35,000 + $131,784
$166,784
2022
$1,479 (−0.2%)
2021
$1,482 (−50.4%)
$35,000 + $131,879
$166,879
2020
$2,986 (−0.2%)
$35,000 + $131,879
$166,879
2019
$2,992 (+1.5%)
$35,000 + $85,246
$120,246
2018
$2,948 (+3.6%)
$35,000 + $82,500
$117,500
2017
$2,846 (+6.1%)
$35,000 + $82,500
$117,500
2016
$2,682 (+3.3%)
$35,000 + $78,000
$113,000
2013
$2,597 (+0.5%)
2012
$2,584
$2,100 + $4,710
$6,810
Tax history for 1663 Tillman St
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$1,649 (+12.6%)
2024
$1,464 (−0.3%)
2023
$1,468 (−0.7%)
$35,000 + $131,784
$166,784
2022
$1,479 (−0.2%)
2021
$1,482 (−50.4%)
$35,000 + $131,879
$166,879
2020
$2,986 (−0.2%)
$35,000 + $131,879
$166,879
2019
$2,992 (+1.5%)
$35,000 + $85,246
$120,246
2018
$2,948 (+3.6%)
$35,000 + $82,500
$117,500
2017
$2,846 (+6.1%)
$35,000 + $82,500
$117,500
2016
$2,682 (+3.3%)
$35,000 + $78,000
$113,000
2013
$2,597 (+0.5%)
2012
$2,584
$2,100 + $4,710
$6,810
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
2
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
0.36 Acres
Year renovated
1995
Sq. Ft.
1,296
Year built
1967
Style
Single Family Residential
County
York County
APN
6300302015
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 17, 2026.
SF-3
Single-Family Residential-3 District
These residential districts are established to primarily provide for single-family detached residential development. A few complementary uses customarily found in residential zoning districts, such as religious institutions, may also be allowed.; These districts are intended to be located in the Neighborhood Residential areas shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. To determine whether SF-3 or SF-4 is more appropriate, the lot sizes in nearby existing neighborhoods will be considered as well as adjacent land uses and the designations of adjacent land on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. For example, if the property proposed to be developed is adjacent to an Edge Management area shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map and is developed with large-lot residential uses, SF-3 would be considered a more appropriate zoning district for the development, whereas if the property to be developed is located more towards the center urban area of the City and is adjacent to mid-density residential subdivisions, SF-4 would be considered a more appropriate zoning district.