Nicole Christensen • ERA Brokers Consolidated (Utah County)
See all
Provided by Redfin
Sale history for 887 N 1040 W
Date
Event
Price
Public Records
Aug 5, 2016
Sold
—
WFRMLS #1386925
Aug 5, 2016
Sold
*
Jul 6, 2016
Pending
—
Jul 5, 2016
Relisted
—
Jun 17, 2016
Pending
—
Jun 15, 2016
Listed
$524,900
$97/sq ft
WFRMLS #1187085
Sep 24, 2013
Listing Removed
—
Sep 12, 2013
Listed
$484,500
$90/sq ft
WFRMLS #1145596
May 31, 2013
Listing Removed
—
Mar 6, 2013
Listed
$484,500
$90/sq ft
Public Records
Aug 16, 2012
Sold
—
Public Records
Feb 28, 2012
Sold
—
Public Records
May 23, 1995
Sold
—
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,446 (+14.8%)
2024
$4,742 (−0.4%)
2023
$4,761 (+5.3%)
2022
$4,520 (+17.1%)
2021
$3,861
2020
$3,859 (+3.2%)
2019
$3,741 (+1.8%)
2018
$3,674 (+0.1%)
2017
$3,669 (+16.2%)
2016
$3,157 (+2.8%)
2015
$3,072 (+5.0%)
2014
$2,926
Tax history for 887 N 1040 W
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,446 (+14.8%)
2024
$4,742 (−0.4%)
2023
$4,761 (+5.3%)
2022
$4,520 (+17.1%)
2021
$3,861
2020
$3,859 (+3.2%)
2019
$3,741 (+1.8%)
2018
$3,674 (+0.1%)
2017
$3,669 (+16.2%)
2016
$3,157 (+2.8%)
2015
$3,072 (+5.0%)
2014
$2,926
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
3
Baths
4.5
Stories
2
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
0.38 Acres
Year renovated
1996
Sq. Ft.
5,406
Year built
1996
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Utah County
APN
365530005
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 21, 2026.
RA-2
Residential-Minor Agricultural Zone
The Residential-Minor Agricultural RA-2 Zone is established for the primary purpose of allowing single-family residential homes on medium sized lots. Incidental and minor agricultural uses are allowed on larger lots with twenty thousand square feet or greater of land. New developments within the RA-2 Zone with a mixture of lots both greater and less than twenty thousand square feet would not allow for animal rights within the subdivision.