Listed by Jeff Lange • First Weber Inc (HomeInfo@firstweber.com). Bought with Keller Williams Realty.
Sold on Aug 2026
$360,000
2
bd
•
2 ba
•
1,507
sq ft
673 Springbrook Cir #65, Deforest, WI 53532
Is this your home?
Track this home’s value and nearby sales activity
About this home
Public Remarks: Enjoy carefree senior living in this 55 and older community tucked away in a serene park-like setting offering beautiful views out the back, a variety of wildlife! This spacious condo offers an abundance of natural lighting. You?ll love the open floor plan. The kitchen with breakfast bar opens to dining and living rooms. Living room has a gas fireplace, the 4-season sunroom with pocket doors leads out to a nice patio with awning. The large master suite with cathedral ceiling has a private master bath with a huge walk-in closet. Newer air conditioner! Zero clearance front entry and ramped entry from garage! The association offers an entertaining Clubhouse for events and family gatherings. Relish having someone else do your lawn and snow shoveling!
CondoProperty Type
2004Year Built
$239Price/Sq.Ft.
$275/moHOA Dues
2 spacesParking
Listed by Jeff Lange• First Weber Inc
Contact: HomeInfo@firstweber.com
Bought with Living In Madison Real Estate Group• Keller Williams Realty
Est. $2,116 per month, based on comparable rentals
Sale and tax history for 673 Springbrook Cir #65
Sale History
Tax History
Date
Event
Price
SCWMLS #2028513
Aug 14, 2026
Sold
$360,000
$239/sq ft
Jul 26, 2026
Contingent
—
Jul 23, 2026
Listed
$359,900
$239/sq ft
Public Records
Jun 2, 2016
Sold
$192,500
$128/sq ft
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$5,173 (+6.6%)
$50,000 + $261,200
$311,200
2024
$4,851 (+4.2%)
$50,000 + $261,200
$311,200
2023
$4,657 (+3.8%)
$45,000 + $240,600
$285,600
2022
$4,487 (−5.2%)
$35,000 + $230,000
$265,000
2021
$4,732 (+1.6%)
$35,000 + $212,800
$247,800
2020
$4,656 (+5.6%)
$35,000 + $195,400
$230,400
2019
$4,408 (+18.7%)
$35,000 + $186,800
$221,800
2018
$3,713 (+3.4%)
$35,000 + $153,600
$188,600
2017
$3,589 (−0.5%)
$35,000 + $153,600
$188,600
2016
$3,607 (+8.1%)
$35,000 + $153,600
$188,600
2014
$3,336 (−0.5%)
$35,000 + $130,800
$165,800
2013
$3,354
$35,000 + $130,800
$165,800
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
—
Stories
—
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
—
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
—
Year built
—
Style
Condo/Co-op
County
Dane County
APN
091007455961
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Aug 6, 2026.
PUD
Planned Unit Development District
The purpose of this section is to encourage improved design in the development of land by providing relief from rigid zoning requirements which are designed for conventional developments but which may preclude desirable but unconventional development. The PUD district shall not be used as a substitute when the Village Board determines that a one or more standard zoning districts would enable implementation of a particular development plan in substantially similar form to that envisioned. In other words, the PUD district shall not be the default choice for new development projects, but instead should be reserved for developments where conforming to standard zoning districts would be impractical or significantly compromise the vision of the development. The PUD district and this section is further intended to promote the following objectives: Diversification in the use permitted, and variation in the relationship of uses, structures, open spaces and heights of structures in developments conceived as unified projects.; Environmental design in the development of land that is of a higher quality than would otherwise be possible through the strict application of general zoning requirements.; Promotion of the functional and beneficial use of common open space.; Preservation of archeological and historic resources and natural landscape features and amenities of a development site and utilization of such features in a harmonious fashion.; Creation of a variety of uses in compatible arrangements which provide a greater choice of living, employment and shopping environments.; Efficient use of land resulting in more cost effective networks of utilities, streets and other facilities.; Coordination of architectural styles, building forms and relationships, graphics and other private improvements.