Light, bright unit ready for your buyer. Single level near green space. The community has 2 pools, a gym, walking paths, mountain views, and near the South Mountain trails.
CondoProperty Type
1986Year Built
620 sq ftLot Size
$281Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
1 spaceParking
Listed by Michelle Leone• Coldwell Banker Realty
Bought with Kevin Levy• Foothills Realty and Mgmt LLC
Excellent investor property. Tenant occupied for 3 years. wants to stay in the property. Great for first time investment. or a buy and hold situation. Simple unit, has all the basics for enjoyable living. Community has pool , clubhouse and spa. strong community feel here.
ARMLS #4156458
Sep 29, 2009
Sold
$22,500
$39/sq ft
Sep 1, 2009
Listing Removed
—
Apr 10, 2009
Listed
$22,900
$40/sq ft
LENDER OWNED FORECLOSURE, REO**SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY.*SOLD IN AS-IS CONDITION**NO SPDS AVAILABLE.** ADD TO PAGE 7 OF PURCHASE CONTRACT BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES NO SPDS OR CLUE REPORT AVAILABLE** THE SELLER NEVER OCCUPIED PROPERTY** SMALLEST UNIT IN THE COMPLEX FACES NORTH INTO COMMON AREA* QUIET UNIT AWAY FROM ROAD* COMPLEX HAS 2 COMMUNITY POOLS
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$539 (+2.6%)
2024
$525 (+2.9%)
2023
$510 (+2.0%)
2022
$500 (−2.0%)
$1,740 + $6,970
$8,710
2021
$510 (+1.3%)
$1,520 + $6,110
$7,630
2020
$504 (+3.4%)
$1,420 + $5,710
$7,130
2019
$487 (+2.8%)
$1,050 + $4,220
$5,270
2018
$474 (+4.9%)
$1,050 + $4,220
$5,270
2017
$452 (+5.4%)
$780 + $3,150
$3,930
2016
$429 (+6.0%)
$750 + $3,010
$3,760
2015
$405 (+4.6%)
$560 + $2,260
$2,820
2014
$387 (+25.6%)
$460 + $1,870
$2,330
2013
$308 (+3.3%)
$380 + $1,520
$1,900
2012
$298 (−19.0%)
$380 + $1,520
$1,900
2011
$368 (−43.3%)
$530 + $2,120
$2,650
2010
$650 (−10.5%)
$1,270 + $5,080
$6,350
2009
$726
$1,570 + $6,280
$7,850
Tax history for 3511 E Baseline Rd #1026
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$539 (+2.6%)
2024
$525 (+2.9%)
2023
$510 (+2.0%)
2022
$500 (−2.0%)
$1,740 + $6,970
$8,710
2021
$510 (+1.3%)
$1,520 + $6,110
$7,630
2020
$504 (+3.4%)
$1,420 + $5,710
$7,130
2019
$487 (+2.8%)
$1,050 + $4,220
$5,270
2018
$474 (+4.9%)
$1,050 + $4,220
$5,270
2017
$452 (+5.4%)
$780 + $3,150
$3,930
2016
$429 (+6.0%)
$750 + $3,010
$3,760
2015
$405 (+4.6%)
$560 + $2,260
$2,820
2014
$387 (+25.6%)
$460 + $1,870
$2,330
2013
$308 (+3.3%)
$380 + $1,520
$1,900
2012
$298 (−19.0%)
$380 + $1,520
$1,900
2011
$368 (−43.3%)
$530 + $2,120
$2,650
2010
$650 (−10.5%)
$1,270 + $5,080
$6,350
2009
$726
$1,570 + $6,280
$7,850
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
—
Baths
1
Stories
1
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
—
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
578
Year built
1986
Style
Condo/Co-op
County
Maricopa County
APN
30123453
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Jul 7, 2026.
R-3*
BASELINE AREA OVERLAY
Multifamily Residence District
The purpose of the multifamily residence districts is to provide for alternate living styles including rental, condominiums and single ownership of land with multiple units thereon or single or attached townhomes.; The density ranges offered are intended to allow for a greater interaction of residents with at least the opportunity for less individual maintenance, unit cost, and size as compared with a conventional single-family residence.; The design options of average lot subdivision, planned residential and single-family attached development are intended to provide flexibility as to unit placement, variable yard requirements, more reasonable and practical use of open spaces, staggered height limits up to three and four stories and more standardized parking and street improvement requirements. Bonus provisions are intended to facilitate and enhance the utilization of smaller infill parcels as well as unusual and irregular parcels throughout the City.; Along with the freedom that the multifamily district offers are certain responsibilities which must be met for project residents, but more importantly for the overall adjacent neighborhood. These are expressed in terms of standards and performance criteria. The standards internal to a project are intended to increase livability with amenities including landscaping, recreational facilities and project design. On the other hand the exterior standards provide a better fit, [and] better the project and the neighborhood environs. Criteria relating to setbacks, screening and landscaping are intended to reduce noise, maintain privacy and minimize psychological feelings to a change in development character and avoid any adverse effect on property values.
The Biltmore area is where Phoenix goes to dress up a little—palm-lined streets, beautiful homes, great restaurants, upscale shopping, and just enough golf carts to remind you that leisure is taken seriously here. It’s sophisticated without being...