Listed by Amy Redpath • Coldwell Banker Redpath and Company. Bought with Coldwell Banker Redpath and Company.
Off Market Jul 2013 for $1.1M
$2,143,381
Est. refi paymentEst. refi$7,259/mo
5
bd
•
6 ba
•
4,922
sq ft
162 Douglas Rd, Norwich, VT 05055
About this home
An extraordinary offering! Imagine your life in this majestic setting of 32 private acres, stone walls, meadows, perennial gardens, 2 patios, pond and views all close to the village of Norwich. The gambrel style cape with 5 bedrooms, 7 baths, 3 car garage, in-law apartment, wood paneled study, master suite with his and hers closets and baths, tigerwood floors throughout, three car garage, French doors and big windows with light pouring in, great storage, living room with marble fireplace and built-ins, basement rec room, and a full wet bar. Formal and informal spaces meld beautifully to make this a perfect home for gatherings large and small!
Single-familyProperty Type
1987Year Built
32.6 acresLot Size
$435Est. Price/Sq.Ft.
3 car garageParking
Listed by Amy Redpath• Coldwell Banker Redpath and Company
Bought with Shelley Gilbert• Coldwell Banker Redpath and Company
This spacious home overlooks a clear mountain pond and open meadows to the hills beyond. Large first floor master suite with 2 full baths. Central air and attention to detail in every room. A separate apartment in a private wing - all this in a neighborhood of fine Norwich homes close to the Village.
PrimeMLS #169777
Dec 22, 2004
Sold
$1,000,000
$203/sq ft
Sep 15, 2004
Listed
$1,100,000
$223/sq ft
VERY SPACIOUS, VERY PRIVATE HOME IN GREAT RURAL NGHBORHD. LRG MSTR SUITE W/ FIREPLACE ON 1ST FLOOR, SOLARIUM W/ STONE FP, LRG MOTHER-IN LAW APT IN ITS OWN PRIVATE WING. HOUSE IS BUILT W/ THE HIGHEST QUALITY MATERIAL, OVERLOOKS LOVELY POND MNT VIEW.
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$22,439 (−20.5%)
$302,200 + $1,289,800
$1,592,000
2024
$28,240 (+16.6%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2023
$24,225 (−20.8%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2022
$30,579 (+3.4%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2021
$29,563 (+3.3%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2020
$28,632 (+1.5%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2019
$28,198 (+9.7%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2018
$25,713 (−8.2%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2016
$28,021 (+0.9%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2015
$27,781 (+1.6%)
$228,900 + $940,800
$1,169,700
2014
$27,347
$228,900 + $940,800
$1,169,700
Tax history for 162 Douglas Rd
Year
Property tax
Land + Additions
Assessment*
2025
$22,439 (−20.5%)
$302,200 + $1,289,800
$1,592,000
2024
$28,240 (+16.6%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2023
$24,225 (−20.8%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2022
$30,579 (+3.4%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2021
$29,563 (+3.3%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2020
$28,632 (+1.5%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2019
$28,198 (+9.7%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2018
$25,713 (−8.2%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2016
$28,021 (+0.9%)
$235,300 + $978,400
$1,213,700
2015
$27,781 (+1.6%)
$228,900 + $940,800
$1,169,700
2014
$27,347
$228,900 + $940,800
$1,169,700
*Taxable value of land and structures on it ("additions") is determined regularly by local assessors and does not affect market price.
Public record
Public record
Zoning
Beds
6
Baths
6
Stories
2
Lot width
—
Lot depth
—
Lot size
32.6 Acres
Year renovated
—
Sq. Ft.
5,364
Year built
1986
Style
Single Family Residential
County
Windsor County
APN
45014211915
Parking Spaces
—
Basement
—
Accessible
—
HOA Dues
—
Garage
—
Features
—
Last updated by owner on Jul 15, 2026.
RR
Rural Residential District
The purpose of the Rural Residential District is to allow low density development in a rural setting, while protecting the natural resources and limiting development in those areas of town accessed by unimproved or substandard roads. The Rural Residential District is intended principally for agriculture, forestry, residential dwellings and associated home-based uses. Residential development is encouraged in appropriate locations in a manner that preserves open space and protects natural resources. Only limited commercial uses are allowed, and then only in a manner that avoids unreasonable burdens on town roads and services or other adverse impacts on the rural, residential character of the district.